Nico Haupt's commentary on "A Critical Review of WTC No-Plane Theories"

29 October 2005

Eric Salter is the 'gauleiter' of academic diversion
articles, which manipulate the readership into the
silly belief system, that 8-10 researchers, who looked
into the flight/plane research are blocking
"activism".

This attitude plays into the misstrategy of exactly
these groups, who're putting activism on hold and
deceiving their followers into false-hope campaigns
and confusing opposite messages (911truth.org), while
at the same time also support messengers of the
official story (Peter Lance, Danny Schecter, Nafeez
Ahmed).

Salter, while extremely proper on anti-peak oil
articles and outings of 911truth.org, this time again
makes the mistake, to merge flight research with plane
research for his alleged criticism.

What works out well in his reflection on Jon Carlson
and the pod analysis, does not sit well with the rest.

He assumes, that so called eye-witnes reports already
allow the conclusion, that a possible non commercial
aircraft hit the towers, while he rules out, that a
distraction aircraft could have been continue flying
without hitting anything and still continue flying.

His language implies, that footage exist in masses,
while actually only 1 official LIVE footage was
broadcasted, which could have been easily delayed by
4-7 seconds, as regularly done by now.

What almost was well done, was at least the
distinction between media/footage manipulation and so
called holographic research. What Salter does not tell
us, are the names of these researchers, to be fair to
the sources. In at least 2 cases, he manipulates the
readership. Grable backed up from holographic
explanations the first time already almost 1.5 years
ago and switched
to media rendering manipulations, even before the
biggest mc carthyism started, by Marc Rabinowitz, a
well known peak oil article supporter.

Back to the only official so called LIVE TV FOOTAGE of
the second hit, which includes a silent hit, followed
by a sound of an internal explosion.

The camera people (CNN amateur tape) had never been
indentified. The footage is highly critical and has
many inconsistencies of logic and other things...

There is not much more than a dozen of identified
footage
angles of the second hit.

Salter manipulates the readership by deceptive use of
the word "U.F.O", which basically only means
UNIDENTIFIED FLYING OBJECT, but let it sound, like
someone has written about aliens.

Salter confuses reporting, blogging and researching.

911blogger.com is a good example of updating 9/11
related research and activism articles, by ignoring
many other research related articles.

911skeptics.blogspot.com did exactly this. It was an
intense blogging about ANY kind of updates, even about
those researchers and activists, we personally
disagreed.

It should be mentioned, that the PR about 911truth.org
was as big as anything else as well. Same was the
amount about plane/flight research, while saboteurs
like Marc Rabinowitz and Nic Levis imply, that would
have been my focus no.1.


Salter refers to some "dirt" as the origin of an
unidentified object in some footage but cannot explain
13 (!) visible helicopters (2 of them passing the
towers at time both each seperate collapses), as
clearly seen on the footage of 911eyewitness.com


I cannot speak for Rosalee Grable aka TheWebfairy, but
as long as i know her (since 3 years), she almost
rarely used the word "U.F.O.", became furthermore
worldwide famous for the better replacement word,
"whatzit".

Salter seems to be not concerned about the political
situation worldwide and appears like a well earning
digital coach potatoe, who is cynical enough to
analyse properly on the one hand the diversion within
this movement, while on the other hand actually
disagreements or 'ego fights' between 'researchers'
never really had been a problem for visible activism
on the streets.

How far his responsibility went, history will prove.

At this time, his latest article will either help or
harm. It just reinforces the diversions.

It's just another cynical clap into the face of some
hard working detail researchers, which he describes as
"idiots".


nico aka ewing2001