Project Censored's MacArthur Foundation Link

by bob feldman
16 Nov 2002

(editor's note: for background to this article please see critique of Peter Phillips' Conspiracies, Plots and Other Anti-democratic Notions)

According to the sixth edition of "Who's Running America? The Clinton Years by Thomas Dye: "The power of the nation's largest foundations derive from their support of significant research projects in social problems, arts, and humanities...The major foundations are in the forefront of national policymaking...The most influential policy-planning group in foreign affairs is the Council on Foreign Relations...The Council on Foreign Relations was founded in 1921 and supported by grants from the Rockefeller and Carnegie foundations and later the Ford Foundation...It initiates new policy directions by first commissioning scholars to undertake investigations of foreign policy questions. Its studies are usually made with the financial support of the foundations." Yet Project Censored rarely mentions that critical reporting about foundations like the MacArthur Foundation or Ford Foundation is generally not done by either the U.S. mainstream media or the U.S. alternative media.

One reason might be that during the 1990s the MacArthur Foundation helped subsidize Project Censored's alternative media activity. Other funders of Project Censored since the 1990s have included the Angelina Fund, the Threshold Foundation, the CS Fund, Foundation for National Progress/Mother Jones Magazine Board Member Anita Roddick and her Body Shop International, the Office of the President & Office of the Provost at Sonoma State University and the Working Assets Inc. telecommunications company.

Regarding Peter Phillips' article, perhaps it's a response to the Gore Vidal article and/or part of an Establishment Left Gatekeeper attempt to begin creating a "parallel 9/11 conspiracy journalism sub-culture" which brings back into the Moyers/Soros/Ford/Working Assets-subsidized alternative media "parallel anti-war" orbit the internet readers and KPFA listeners who have begun to look to the more independent web sites for their 9/11 information and alternative analysis?


back to section intro...



questionsquestions.net